Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Uhans K01
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Uhans K01 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 38695 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
| Material | Metal | |
| Weight | 149 g | g |
| Dimensions | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Uhans models here
Alternatives to the Uhans K01: |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Uhans K01: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Uhans K01’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Uhans K01 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Uhans K01: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Uhans K01, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Uhans K01 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Uhans K01: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Uhans K01, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Uhans K01: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Uhans K01 which got 115, it is 0.87% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 491 (22.81% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Uhans K01? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Uhans K01 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
Why it is better not to take Uhans K01 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus