Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75
| Name | Ulefone Armor 24 | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359332 | 244377 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G96 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.88 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1640 x 720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 22000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Material | Metal and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 647 g | 204 g |
| Dimensions | 181,2 x 87 x 27,5 mm | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 24: Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro - Compare Ulefone Armor 11 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C75: Xiaomi Redmi 10A 4/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Mi 10S 12/256Gb - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 24’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C75’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 24 | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 24 | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 22000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 24 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359332 score points which is 47.04% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C75, which got 244377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 24 vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 24 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 569 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C75 which got 391, it is 45.52% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1858 vs 1391 (33.57% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 24 and Xiaomi Poco C75? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 24 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 47.04% faster in the Antutu test (114955 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1640 x 720.
- More battery capacity: 22000mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 16840mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 24 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C75 (advantages)
- Best weight: 443 grams less (204 vs 647).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C75 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 24 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Blackview BV9300
- Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Ulefone Armor 24
- Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Ulefone Armor 22
Xiaomi Poco C75 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75