Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G
| Name | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version | Blackview Shark 9 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2331783 | 471665 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | UNISOC T820 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1604x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 16 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX989 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 10600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 450 g | 200 g |
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 82.6 x 19.4 mm | 164.8 x 75.6 x 8.65 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: Ulefone Note 12P - Compare Ulefone Note 13P - Compare Ulefone Note 12 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Blackview models here
Alternatives to the Blackview Shark 9 5G: Blackview A55 - Compare Blackview A60 - Compare Blackview A80 Plus - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version’s camera vs Blackview Shark 9 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX989 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version | Blackview Shark 9 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX989 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version | Blackview Shark 9 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2331783 score points which is 394.37% faster than the Blackview Shark 9 5G, which got 471665. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Blackview Shark 9 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2671 points score in "Single-core" of against the Blackview Shark 9 5G which got 809, it is 230.16% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6288 vs 2431 (158.66% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version and Blackview Shark 9 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 394.37% faster in the Antutu test (1860118 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1604x720.
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview Shark 9 5G (advantages)
- Best weight: 250 grams less (200 vs 450).
Why it is better not to take Blackview Shark 9 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X8
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor 6E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X7 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X5
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor 12S
Blackview Shark 9 5G related comparisons
- Compare Blackview Shark 9 5G vs Blackview Shark 8
- Compare Blackview Shark 9 5G vs Blackview BV9600
- Compare Blackview Shark 9 5G vs Blackview BV4900S
- Compare Blackview Shark 9 5G vs Blackview OSCAL C20
- Compare Blackview Shark 9 5G vs Blackview BV5900