Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 92177 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 196 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 164,2 x 75,9 x 9.1 mm |
| Price | 264.93€ ($287.69) See Details | 105.76€ ($114.85) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A02s’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 60.78% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB, which got 92177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB which got 160, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 907 (62.62% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 60.78% faster in the Antutu test (56022 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 168 grams less (196 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A10s vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M11 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Oppo A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s