Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 258744 | 148199 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 203 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - Compare |
266.63€ ($287.69) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 258744 score points which is 74.59% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 586 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 83.12% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1786 vs 1475 (21.08% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 74.59% faster in the Antutu test (110545 score difference).
- Best weight: 161 grams less (203 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A12 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A21s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT