Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 129663 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Samsung GM2 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 221 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 164 x 75,9 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 268.42€ ($287.69) See Details | 104.27€ ($111.75) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M12’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Samsung GM2 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 14.30% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB, which got 129663. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB which got 162, it is 97.53% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 933 (58.09% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 14.30% faster in the Antutu test (18536 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 143 grams less (221 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A12 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy M12