Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 109489 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 194 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm |
| Price | 249.63€ ($287.69) See Details | 89.03€ ($102.60) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 35.36% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb, which got 109489. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb which got 175, it is 82.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 984 (49.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 35.36% faster in the Antutu test (38710 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 5280mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 170 grams less (194 vs 364).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 2/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9A vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C