Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3W | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 21244 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Armor X6 - Compare Ulefone Armor 6E - Compare Ulefone Armor X7 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot Note 8 - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3W | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3W | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3W in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 597.60% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3W vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3W in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 433.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 249 (492.37% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3W and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 597.60% faster in the Antutu test (126955 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 5900mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Best weight: 144 grams less (220 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS