Compare Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 441275 | 148199 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9825 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 218 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy F62: Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 6/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Note 6T - Compare Ulefone Armor X10 Pro - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 19 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy F62’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 441275 score points which is 197.76% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3W, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 768 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3W which got 320, it is 140.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2387 vs 1475 (61.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy F62 and Ulefone Armor 3W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy F62 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 197.76% faster in the Antutu test (293076 score difference).
- Best weight: 146 grams less (218 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy F62 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 7000mAh (a difference of 3300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy F62 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M31S vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F62
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W