0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3

Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Ulefone Armor 9E with Nokia 2.3.

Name Ulefone Armor 9E Nokia 2.3
Ulefone Armor 9E Nokia 2.3
Antutu benchmark 223811 69311
CPU MediaTek Helio P90 MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size 6.3 " 6.2 "
Resolution 2340x1080 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 32 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model Samsung GW1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 6600 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastics and rubber Plastic
Weight 320 g 183 g
Dimensions 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm
  Price 317.29€ ($366.46) See Details 112.55€ ($129.99) See Details

Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Ulefone Armor 9E Nokia 2.3
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Samsung GW1
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Ulefone Armor 9E Nokia 2.3
Battery 6600 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging Yes No

Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison. Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 222.91% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Ulefone Armor 9E
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 6600mAh
317.29€
$366.46
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
112.55€
$129.99
 

Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Ulefone Armor 9E
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio P90 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 6600mAh
317.29€
$366.46
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
112.55€
$129.99
 

What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 222.91% faster in the Antutu test (154500 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 137 grams less (183 vs 320).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons

Nokia 2.3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 62
Frequent comparisons