Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 129663 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Samsung GM2 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 221 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 164 x 75,9 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 317.98€ ($366.46) See Details | 115.63€ ($133.26) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M12’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Samsung GM2 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 72.61% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB, which got 129663. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB which got 162, it is 157.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 933 (64.09% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 72.61% faster in the Antutu test (94148 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 48Mp Samsung GM2
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 99 grams less (221 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A12 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy M12