Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 290582 | 224199 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 720 | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 205 g | 320 g |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm |
| Price | 235.00€ ($247.84) See Details | 364.16€ ($384.05) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 9’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 290582 score points which is 29.61% faster than the Ulefone Armor 9, which got 224199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Ulefone Armor 9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 505 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 9 which got 416, it is 21.39% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1659 vs 1534 (8.15% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Ulefone Armor 9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 29.61% faster in the Antutu test (66383 score difference).
- Best weight: 115 grams less (205 vs 320).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 48Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Ulefone Armor 9 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 9