Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 16S | Xiaomi Poco C3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 271668 | 109489 |
| CPU | UNISOC Tiger T616 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Diagonal size | 5.93 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 1440x720 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 406 g | 194 g |
| Dimensions | 173.4 x 83.35 x 18.3 mm | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Power Armor 16S: Ulefone Power Armor 14 - Compare Ulefone Armor 8 - Compare Ulefone Armor X8 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C3: Xiaomi Poco C40 4/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi 12 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi 13 8/128GB - Compare |
Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Power Armor 16S’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C3’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 16S | Xiaomi Poco C3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 16S | Xiaomi Poco C3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 16S in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 271668 score points which is 148.12% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C3, which got 109489. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Xiaomi Poco C3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 16S in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 395 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C3 which got 175, it is 125.71% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1411 vs 984 (43.39% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Power Armor 16S and Xiaomi Poco C3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power Armor 16S (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 148.12% faster in the Antutu test (162179 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 9600mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 4580mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power Armor 16S (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C3 (advantages)
- Best weight: 212 grams less (194 vs 406).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1440x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C3 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Ulefone Power Armor 16S related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Ulefone Armor X10 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs Ulefone Armor 6S
Xiaomi Poco C3 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9A vs Xiaomi Poco C3
- Compare Doogee BL5500 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco C3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Huawei Honor Play 9A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global vs Xiaomi Poco C3
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 vs Xiaomi Poco C3