Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 485875 | 147114 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 6.09 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX586 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal and rubber | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 409 g | 174 g |
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm |
| Price | 328.02€ ($379.57) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40S 6/128GB - Compare |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Power Armor 18’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9e’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX586 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 485875 score points which is 230.27% faster than the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb, which got 147114. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 781 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb which got 310, it is 151.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2845 vs 1340 (112.31% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Power Armor 18 and Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power Armor 18 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 230.27% faster in the Antutu test (338761 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX586
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 9600mAh vs 4030mAh (a difference of 5570mAh).
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power Armor 18 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 235 grams less (174 vs 409).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Ulefone Power Armor 18
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs OUKITEL WP21
- Compare Doogee V30 5G vs Ulefone Power Armor 18
Xiaomi CC9e 6/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A3 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Lenovo Z6 Youth vs Xiaomi CC9e