Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 485875 | 101655 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 6.52 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Material | Metal and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 409 g | 192 g |
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm | 164.9 x 76.75 x 9.09 mm |
| Price | 323.85€ ($379.57) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C50: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11s 6/128Gb NFC - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9A 4/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro 8/128GB - Compare |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Power Armor 18’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C50’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 485875 score points which is 377.96% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C50, which got 101655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 18 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 781 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C50 which got 152, it is 413.82% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2845 vs 636 (347.33% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Power Armor 18 and Xiaomi Poco C50? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power Armor 18 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 377.96% faster in the Antutu test (384220 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 9600mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 4600mAh).
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power Armor 18 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C50 (advantages)
- Best weight: 217 grams less (192 vs 409).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C50 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Power Armor 18 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Ulefone Power Armor 18
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Compare Doogee V30 5G vs Ulefone Power Armor 18
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs OUKITEL WP21
Xiaomi Poco C50 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi 12S vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C31 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Blackview BV9200 vs Xiaomi Poco C50