Compare Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 19T | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 355422 | 244377 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 6.88 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1640 x 720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Material | Metal and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 409 g | 204 g |
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Power Armor 19T: Ulefone Armor X10 - Compare Ulefone Note 9P - Compare Ulefone Armor 8 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C75: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G NE 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40S 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 16/512GB - Compare |
Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C75’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 19T | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Power Armor 19T | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 9600 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 19T in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 355422 score points which is 45.44% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C75, which got 244377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Power Armor 19T in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 564 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C75 which got 391, it is 44.25% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1857 vs 1391 (33.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Power Armor 19T and Xiaomi Poco C75? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power Armor 19T (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 45.44% faster in the Antutu test (111045 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1640 x 720.
- More battery capacity: 9600mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 4440mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power Armor 19T (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C75 (advantages)
- Best weight: 205 grams less (204 vs 409).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C75 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Power Armor 19T related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 19T vs Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Compare Doogee V20 Pro vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Compare IIIF150 Raptor vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Compare Ulefone Armor 11T 5G vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T
Xiaomi Poco C75 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75