Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone S1 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 21098 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 183 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 148,6 x 70,7 x 9,6 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone S1: Ulefone Armor X8 - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 14 - Compare Ulefone Armor 2 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Ulefone S1’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone S1 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone S1 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 1210.30% faster than the Ulefone S1, which got 21098. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone S1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone S1 which got 65, it is 670.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 222 (794.59% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Ulefone S1? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1210.30% faster in the Antutu test (255350 score difference).
- Best weight: 44 grams less (139 vs 183).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 960x480.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone S1 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone S1 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Ulefone S1 related comparisons
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs Ulefone S1
- Compare Blackview A20 vs Ulefone S1
- Compare HomTom S12 vs Ulefone S1
- Compare Ulefone S7 vs Ulefone S1
- Compare Ulefone S1 vs OUKITEL C10