Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with VKworld VK6050.
Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	VKworld VK6050

Antutu benchmark	37524
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2800 mAh	6050 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0
Material	Metal and plastic
Weight	140 g	g
Dimensions	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:	Discontinued. View all VKworld models here Alternatives to the VKworld VK6050:

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs VKworld VK6050’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	VKworld VK6050
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs VKworld VK6050, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	VKworld VK6050
Battery	2800 mAh	6050 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours
Talk time	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the VKworld VK6050, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

VKworld VK6050

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 6050mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs VKworld VK6050: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the VKworld VK6050 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

VKworld VK6050

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 6050mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and VKworld VK6050? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the VKworld VK6050 (advantages)

More battery capacity: 6050mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 3250mAh).

Why it is better not to take VKworld VK6050 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

VKworld VK6050 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.61/5 of 425

Frequent comparisons