0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with Vargo V210101.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Vargo V210101
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Vargo V210101
Antutu benchmark 37524
CPU MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615
Diagonal size 5 " 5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 3 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 32 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb No
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 2800 mAh 2500 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 6.0 Android 5.1
Material Metal and plastic Metal
Weight 140 g 124 g
Dimensions 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm 141 x 67 x 6.2 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:
Discontinued. View all Vargo models here
Alternatives to the Vargo V210101:

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Vargo V210101’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Vargo V210101
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Vargo V210101, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Vargo V210101
Battery 2800 mAh 2500 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 20 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Vargo V210101, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vargo V210101
5" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 615 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 2500mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Vargo V210101: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vargo V210101 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vargo V210101
5" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 615 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 2500mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Vargo V210101? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vargo V210101 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 16 grams less (124 vs 140).
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Vargo V210101 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Vargo V210101 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.61/5 of 425
Frequent comparisons