Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | AGM A9 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 65331 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.99 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5400 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 251 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 97.20€ ($112.68) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
AGM A9 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM A9’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM A9 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
AGM A9 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM A9 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM A9 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5400 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
AGM A9 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM A9 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 65331 score points which is 68.84% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM A9 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM A9 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 146 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 25.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 146 vs 603 (-75.79% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM A9 4/64Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 68.84% faster in the Antutu test (26636 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Sony IMX486 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 380mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 102 grams less (149 vs 251).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus