Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 318567 | 38695 |
| CPU | Apple A11 Bionic | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 2680 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | iOS | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 202 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 158,4 x 78,1 x 7,5 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 273.56€ ($297.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Apple iPhone 8 Plus’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Four LEDs | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2680 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 318567 score points which is 723.28% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 919 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 692.24% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1964 vs 603 (225.70% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 723.28% faster in the Antutu test (279872 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 53 grams less (149 vs 202).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 2680mAh (a difference of 2340mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus