Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 612556 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.59 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | 240 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 171 x 78 x 9.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Asus models here
Alternatives to the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global: Asus ROG Phone 7 8/256GB Global ROM - Compare Asus ROG Phone 5s 12/256Gb - Compare Asus ROG Phone 6 12/128GB GLOBAL ROM - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 612556 score points which is 1483.04% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 927 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 699.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3348 vs 603 (455.22% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1483.04% faster in the Antutu test (573861 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 980mAh).
Why it is better not to take Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 91 grams less (149 vs 240).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global related comparisons
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
- Compare Realme C15 vs Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus