Compare Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV6800 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 44112 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6750T | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 274 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 81 x 14.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 152.82€ ($177.17) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6800 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6800 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6800 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6800 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 44112 score points which is 14.00% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6800 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 123 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 6.03% faster. In "Multi-core" score 632 vs 603 (4.81% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6800 Pro and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6800 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 14.00% faster in the Antutu test (5417 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6580mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 1560mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6800 Pro (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 125 grams less (149 vs 274).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Blackview BV6800 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV6800 Pro vs OUKITEL WP1
- Compare Blackview BV6800 Pro vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus