Compare Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9100 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 92886 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 13000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 408 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 171.28 x 80.2 x 19.45 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 203.83€ ($239.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9100’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9100 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9100 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 13000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9100 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 92886 score points which is 140.05% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9100 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9100 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 176 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 51.72% faster. In "Multi-core" score 866 vs 603 (43.62% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9100 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9100 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 140.05% faster in the Antutu test (54191 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 13000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 7980mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9100 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 259 grams less (149 vs 408).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV9100 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Blackview BV9100
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Blackview BV9100
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Blackview BV9100
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Blackview BV9100
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Blackview BV9100
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus