Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Blackview BV9600E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 144611 | 38695 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.21 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2248х1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P8 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 5580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal |
Weight | 234 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 162,9 x 81,4 x 12,85 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price | 225.07€ ($240.70) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9600E’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P8 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Blackview BV9600E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P8 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Blackview BV9600E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9600E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 144611 score points which is 273.72% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9600E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9600E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 314 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 170.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1435 vs 603 (137.98% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9600E and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9600E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 273.72% faster in the Antutu test (105916 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P8 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp Sony IMX134 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2248х1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 560mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9600E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 85 grams less (149 vs 234).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV9600E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV9600E
- Compare OUKITEL WP6 vs Blackview BV9600E
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Blackview BV9600E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Blackview BV9600E
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus