Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9800 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 146188 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 322 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 168.5 x 81 x 14,8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 399.99€ ($426.69) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9800’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9800 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9800 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6580 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9800 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 146188 score points which is 277.80% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9800 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9800 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 280 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 141.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1423 vs 603 (135.99% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9800 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9800 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 277.80% faster in the Antutu test (107493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6580mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 1560mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9800 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 173 grams less (149 vs 322).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Blackview BV9800 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Blackview BV9800
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Blackview BV9800
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Blackview BV9800
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs Blackview BV9800
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus