Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Cubot King Kong Mini | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 56199 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1080x540 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 2000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 157 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 119 x 58 x 12.1 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong Mini: Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot J5 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Mini’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot King Kong Mini | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot King Kong Mini | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Mini in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 56199 score points which is 45.24% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong Mini vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Mini in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 38.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 538 vs 603 (-10.78% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Mini and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Mini (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 45.24% faster in the Antutu test (17504 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 8 grams less (149 vs 157).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 3020mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
Cubot King Kong Mini related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Ulefone Armor 5S
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Blackview BV9100 vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot King Kong 3 vs Cubot King Kong Mini
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus