Compare Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 182177 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 285 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 168*79,3*13,8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 124.13€ ($142.73) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Doogee S95 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee S95 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 182177 score points which is 370.80% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 258.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1534 vs 603 (154.39% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 370.80% faster in the Antutu test (143482 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 130mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 136 grams less (149 vs 285).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Doogee S95 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus