Compare LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K9 with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.
Name	LG K9	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	48765	38695
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	2 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Battery	2500 mAh	5020 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.1	Android 7.0
Material	Plastic	Metal
Weight	152 g	149 g
Dimensions	146,3 x 73,2 x 8,2 mm	144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
Price	90.00€ ($93.57) See Details	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K9’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG K9	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Flash	No	No

LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG K9	Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery	2500 mAh	5020 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	10-12 hours
Talk time	25 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 48765 score points which is 26.02% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K9

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 210 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2500mAh

90.00€

$93.57

48765

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh

0.00€

$0.00

38695

LG K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 96 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is -17.24% faster. In "Multi-core" score 336 vs 603 (-44.28% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K9

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 210 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2500mAh

90.00€

$93.57

96 / 336

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 603

What is the difference between LG K9 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K9 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 26.02% faster in the Antutu test (10070 score difference).
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .

Why it is better not to take LG K9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 3 grams less (149 vs 152).
More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2520mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K9 related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons