Compare LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | LG V60 ThinQ | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 597255 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.8 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 100 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 103 | |
| dxomark (video) | 93 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 214 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 169,3 x 77,6 x 8,9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 433.60€ ($450.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LG V60 ThinQ’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | LG V60 ThinQ | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | LG V60 ThinQ | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LG V60 ThinQ in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 597255 score points which is 1443.49% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LG V60 ThinQ in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 893 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 669.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3321 vs 603 (450.75% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LG V60 ThinQ and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG V60 ThinQ (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1443.49% faster in the Antutu test (558560 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take LG V60 ThinQ (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 65 grams less (149 vs 214).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LG V60 ThinQ related comparisons
- Compare LG V50 ThinQ 5G vs LG V60 ThinQ
- Compare LG Velvet 5G vs LG V60 ThinQ
- Compare LG V60 ThinQ vs LG Wing
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus vs LG V60 ThinQ
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 vs LG V60 ThinQ
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus