Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
                          
                         | 
                
                    
                          
                         | 
                
            |
| Antutu benchmark | 158799 | 38695 | 
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek MT6753 | 
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5 " | 
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1280x720 | 
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 | 
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb | 
| Bezel-less | Yes | No | 
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB | 
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | 
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera | 
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp | 
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh | 
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G | 
| WiFi | Yes | Yes | 
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | 
| NFC | No | No | 
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | 
| Notifications Led | No | Yes | 
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes | 
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 | 
| Material | Plastic | Metal | 
| Weight | 189 g | 149 g | 
| Dimensions | 161,9 x 75,7 x 9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm | 
| Price | 
    
    
    Notify me when it goes on sale.
    View all Motorola models here
     Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G Fast: Motorola Moto G23 - Compare Motorola Edge 30 Fusion 8/128GB - Compare Motorola Moto G62 5G 4/128GB - Compare  | 
                
            
                
                    
    
    
    Discontinued. 
    View all Vernee models here
     Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:  | 
                
            
        
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G Fast’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash | 
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp | 
| Flash | No | No | 
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh | 
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable | 
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days | 
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days | 
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours | 
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours | 
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes | 
| Wireless charging | No | 
                        
 
                        Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
                    
                Motorola Moto G Fast in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 158799 score points which is 310.39% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G Fast in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 169.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 603 (126.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto G Fast and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Fast (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 310.39% faster in the Antutu test (120104 score difference).
 - Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
 - Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
 - Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1280x720.
 
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Fast (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 40 grams less (149 vs 189).
 - More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
 
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
 - Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
 
Motorola Moto G Fast related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
 - Compare UMIDIGI One Max vs Motorola Moto G Fast
 - Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
 - Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Huawei Mate 40e
 - Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
 - Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
 - Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
 - Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus