0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 7.2 6/128GB with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name Nokia 7.2 6/128GB Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Nokia 7.2 6/128GB Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 148113 38695
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.3 " 5 "
Resolution 2340x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 6 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 3500 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 7.0
Material Plastic frame and glass case Metal
Weight 180 g 149 g
Dimensions 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price 276.42€ ($299.00) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 7.2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 7.2 6/128GB Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 7.2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 7.2 6/128GB Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 3500 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148113 score points which is 282.77% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 660 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 3500mAh
276.42€
$299.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 327 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 181.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1443 vs 603 (139.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 660 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 3500mAh
276.42€
$299.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Nokia 7.2 6/128GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 7.2 6/128GB (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 282.77% faster in the Antutu test (109418 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 2Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 7.2 6/128GB (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 31 grams less (149 vs 180).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 1520mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 7.2 6/128GB related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.75/5 of 4
Frequent comparisons