Compare OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 45831 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6750T | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Omnivison OV16880 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6080 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 200 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 153.4 x 77,0 x 9.0 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb: OUKITEL WP5 4/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP9 - Compare OUKITEL WP10 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL K6000 Plus’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Omnivison OV16880 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL K6000 Plus vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6080 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging |
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 45831 score points which is 18.44% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 134 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 15.52% faster. In "Multi-core" score 639 vs 603 (5.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 18.44% faster in the Antutu test (7136 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6080mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 1060mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 51 grams less (149 vs 200).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL K6000 Plus 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Asus Zenfone 4 Max Plus
- Compare Blackview BV7000 Pro vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Vernee Thor E