Compare OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | OUKITEL WP2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 47017 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6750T | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2P7 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 300 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 172 x 85 x 13 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 117.69€ ($127.91) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K2P7 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2P7 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 47017 score points which is 21.51% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 124 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 6.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 470 vs 603 (-22.06% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP2 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 21.51% faster in the Antutu test (8322 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K2P7 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp GalaxyCore GC8024 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 4980mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP2 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 151 grams less (149 vs 300).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP2 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs OUKITEL WP2
- Compare OUKITEL WP2 vs OUKITEL WP1
- Compare OUKITEL WP2 vs Doogee S70 Lite
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs OUKITEL WP2
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs OUKITEL WP2
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus