Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 182188 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.53 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 294 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 174 x 81 x 17 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 228.32€ ($263.70) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP7’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP7 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 182188 score points which is 370.83% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP7 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 381 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 228.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1460 vs 603 (142.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP7 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP7 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 370.83% faster in the Antutu test (143493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 2980mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP7 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 145 grams less (149 vs 294).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
OUKITEL WP7 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs OUKITEL WP6
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Blackview BV9900 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus