Compare Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Oppo A72 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 150413 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 192 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 169.00€ ($194.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo A72’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo A72 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo A72 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo A72 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 150413 score points which is 288.71% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo A72 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo A72 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 169.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1390 vs 603 (130.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo A72 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo A72 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 288.71% faster in the Antutu test (111718 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo A72 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 43 grams less (149 vs 192).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Oppo A72 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Oppo A72
- Compare Oppo A52 vs Oppo A72
- Compare Oppo A74 5G vs Oppo A72
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G vs Oppo A72
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10 vs Oppo A72
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus