Compare Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 658770 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 3216x1440 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 193 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 586.51€ ($614.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Find X3’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX766 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Find X3 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Find X3 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 658770 score points which is 1602.47% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 933 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 704.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3278 vs 603 (443.62% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Find X3 8/128GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Find X3 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1602.47% faster in the Antutu test (620075 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX766 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3216x1440 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Find X3 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 44 grams less (149 vs 193).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Oppo Find X3 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Find X3 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Compare OnePlus 8 vs Oppo Find X3
- Compare Oppo Find X3 vs Oppo Reno 4 5G
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Oppo Find X3
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro vs Oppo Find X3
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus