0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Reno 2 with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name Oppo Reno 2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Oppo Reno 2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 216188 38695
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.5 " 5 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 256 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX586
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 4000 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 7.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal
Weight 189 g 149 g
Dimensions 160 x 74.3 x 9.5 mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price 330.99€ ($353.98) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno 2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Reno 2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX586
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Reno 2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 4000 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 216188 score points which is 458.70% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Reno 2
6.5 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 730 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4000mAh
330.99€
$353.98
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Oppo Reno 2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 545 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 369.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1707 vs 603 (183.08% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Reno 2
6.5 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 730 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4000mAh
330.99€
$353.98
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Oppo Reno 2 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 2 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 458.70% faster in the Antutu test (177493 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 2 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 40 grams less (149 vs 189).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Oppo Reno 2 related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.73/5 of 11
Frequent comparisons