Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 332164 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 7000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | g | 149 g |
Dimensions | mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb: Samsung Galaxy S21 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 4/64GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M62’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 7000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 332164 score points which is 758.42% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 655 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 464.66% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1941 vs 603 (221.89% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 758.42% faster in the Antutu test (293469 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 1980mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M62 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus