Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 389442 | 38695 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9820 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 3040x1440 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4100 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 175 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 157,6 x 70,4 x 7,8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 331.03€ ($379.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4100 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 389442 score points which is 906.44% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 825 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 611.21% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2259 vs 603 (274.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 906.44% faster in the Antutu test (350747 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3040x1440 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 26 grams less (149 vs 175).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4100mAh (a difference of 920mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A72
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus