Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 512775 | 38695 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 163 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 151,7 x 69,1 x 7,9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 454.72€ ($470.25) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 512775 score points which is 1225.17% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 580 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 400.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2616 vs 603 (333.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1225.17% faster in the Antutu test (474080 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 14 grams less (149 vs 163).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy S20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus