Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 468775 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2640x1200 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 183 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 167,3 x 73,6 x 7,2 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: Samsung Galaxy M01 - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 6/128Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 468775 score points which is 1111.46% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 755 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 550.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2675 vs 603 (343.62% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1111.46% faster in the Antutu test (430080 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2640x1200 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 34 grams less (149 vs 183).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1720mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Samsung Galaxy S21
- Compare Apple iPhone 12 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Apple iPhone 12 Mini vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus