0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Sharp AQUOS S2 with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name Sharp AQUOS S2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Sharp AQUOS S2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 103488 38695
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5 "
Resolution 2040x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 12 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 2700 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 7.1 Android 7.0
Material Metal frame and plastic case Metal
Weight 140 g 149 g
Dimensions 141.8 x 72.04 x 7.9 mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price 98.67€ ($114.36) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Sharp AQUOS S2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Sharp AQUOS S2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 12 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Sharp AQUOS S2 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 2700 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging

Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Sharp AQUOS S2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 103488 score points which is 167.45% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Sharp AQUOS S2
5.5 inches (2040x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 630 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 2700mAh
98.67€
$114.36
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Sharp AQUOS S2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 179 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 54.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1034 vs 603 (71.48% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Sharp AQUOS S2
5.5 inches (2040x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 630 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 2700mAh
98.67€
$114.36
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Sharp AQUOS S2 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp AQUOS S2 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 167.45% faster in the Antutu test (64793 score difference).
  • Best weight: 9 grams less (140 vs 149).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2040x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Sharp AQUOS S2 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 2320mAh).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Sharp AQUOS S2 related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.62/5 of 179
Frequent comparisons