0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb with Ulefone Armor 2S.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Ulefone Armor 2S
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Ulefone Armor 2S
Antutu benchmark 38695 31155
CPU MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6737T
Diagonal size 5 " 5.5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 10
RAM 3 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5020 mAh 4700 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 7.0 Android 7.0
Material Metal Plastics and rubber
Weight 149 g 270 g
Dimensions 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm 154 x 76 x 13 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:
Discontinued. View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 2S:
Ulefone Note 10P - Compare
Ulefone Note 13P - Compare
Ulefone Armor 11 - Compare

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 2S’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Ulefone Armor 2S
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX135
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Ulefone Armor 2S, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Ulefone Armor 2S
Battery 5020 mAh 4700 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 24.20% faster than the Ulefone Armor 2S, which got 31155. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Ulefone Armor 2S
5.5 inches (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / MT6737T / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 4700mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Armor 2S: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 2S which got 123, it is -5.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 407 (48.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Ulefone Armor 2S
5.5 inches (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / MT6737T / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 4700mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Ulefone Armor 2S? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 24.20% faster in the Antutu test (7540 score difference).
  • Best weight: 121 grams less (149 vs 270).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4700mAh (a difference of 320mAh).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 2S (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX135 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 2S (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Ulefone Armor 2S related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.63/5 of 296
Frequent comparisons