Compare Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 671113 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 196 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB: Vivo X90 Pro 8/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X90 Pro+ - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671113 score points which is 1634.37% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 695.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3346 vs 603 (454.89% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1634.37% faster in the Antutu test (632418 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 47 grams less (149 vs 196).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo NEX 3S vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo S5 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo X30 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus