Compare Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1048337 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 206 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164.55 x 76.7 x 8.37 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 613.66€ ($711.42) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 9’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN5 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1048337 score points which is 2609.23% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1211 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 943.97% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4198 vs 603 (596.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2609.23% faster in the Antutu test (1009642 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN5 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 57 grams less (149 vs 206).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4700mAh (a difference of 320mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo X30
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo S6
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus