Compare Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo S7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 327119 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.44 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 44 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 170 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 158.82 x 74.2 x 7.39 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo S7: Vivo IQOO Neo7 12/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo6 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 11 Pro 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo S7’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo S7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 44 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo S7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo S7 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 327119 score points which is 745.38% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo S7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo S7 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 673 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 480.17% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1966 vs 603 (226.04% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo S7 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo S7 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 745.38% faster in the Antutu test (288424 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 44Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Vivo S7 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 21 grams less (149 vs 170).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo S7 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro vs Vivo S7
- Compare Vivo S7 vs Vivo S9
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition vs Vivo S7
- Compare Vivo S6 vs Vivo S7
- Compare Vivo X30 Pro vs Vivo S7
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus