Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 767944 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4650 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | 218 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 163.8 × 76.2 × 10 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price | 356.21€ ($379.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 5’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW3 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4650 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 767944 score points which is 1884.61% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 919 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 692.24% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3326 vs 603 (451.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1884.61% faster in the Antutu test (729249 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW3 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 69 grams less (149 vs 218).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4650mAh (a difference of 370mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Asus ROG Phone 5
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus