Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 234188 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 208 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.79 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 12/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 12C 4/128GB NFC - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 234188 score points which is 505.22% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 547 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 371.55% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1762 vs 603 (192.21% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 505.22% faster in the Antutu test (195493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 59 grams less (149 vs 208).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus