Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 143188 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 209 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76 x 8.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global 4/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco X5 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 143188 score points which is 270.04% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 325 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 180.17% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1466 vs 603 (143.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 270.04% faster in the Antutu test (104493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 140mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 60 grams less (149 vs 209).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Vivo V20 SE
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 Lite vs Realme Narzo 30A
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus